Welcome to visit ubet63 login philippines !

baccarat 747
_lustre baccarat
_baccarat 800

Your current location is: Home > ubet63 casino register philippines > main body >

ubet63 casino register philippines

baccarat 747

Release time: 2025-01-08 ubet63 casino register philippines
baccarat 747
Almost every week there is a new toxic culture story in the media, and Australia is no exception. Allegations of toxic management have been reported at WiseTech , Country Road Group, Bureau of Meteorology and Sony Australia to name a few. The culture in some parts of Nine (the owner of this masthead) was alleged to be so toxic that employees dubbed it “Punishment Island ”. According to research , almost half the world’s population dreads going to work. That feeling, in the pit of the stomach, of having to work in an environment of uncertainty, fear, poor communication, micromanagement, bullying or daily toxic behaviours can be difficult to bear. No human being should ever suffer at the hands of a bad boss and in situations where you cannot quit. Credit: Andrew Quilty Yet, what the research doesn’t make clear, is that regardless of this feeling of dread, people will show up anyway because, well, they have to. Groceries need to be bought, mortgages or rent need to be paid, children need to be educated or loved ones cared for. Far too often the advice – if you dread going to work – is simply to quit. But for many this is impossible, as the uncertainties are too great or the risks of loss of income too high. So how do you deal with a toxic boss when quitting isn’t an option? In my experience of having worked with individuals in this position there are eight steps I always advise before thinking about taking on the uncertainty of quitting. They are: 1. Look after yourself first. In toxic work situations, your wellbeing needs to be the top priority. Regular exercise, proper nutrition and adequate rest form the foundation of mental resilience. Your physical health directly influences how well you handle workplace challenges. Many toxic bosses have received payouts in the millions for bringing untold misery to the people that report to them. 2. Excellence as protection. Maintaining impeccable work quality to defend against unfair criticism. Model professional behaviour to ensure there can be no blame laid at your door. 3. Document your experiences. Dedicate brief daily moments to record your workplace experiences and feelings. Simple starters such as “My feelings today...“, “What impacted me...” or “Observable actions included...” are a good place to start. This has a two-fold advantage of creating an “audit trail” of how you (and others) are treated and can also help to process your emotions. 4. Open communication channels. If it feels safe enough to do so, engage your manager in professional, focused discussions about specific concerns and potential remedies. Express how their actions or behaviours make you feel. 5. Involve HR. If direct communication with your manager isn’t viable, bring your concerns to your human resources department. Present objective observations (as documented in point number 3) of what you’ve experienced. 6. Consider internal moves. If these approaches prove unsuccessful, explore transfers or temporary assignments within the company to both escape the toxic environment and broaden your experience. 7. Foster relationships. Develop a reliable network of friends, colleagues or mentors who can offer support and perspective when needed. This safety net is essential for navigating difficult times. 8. Define your boundaries. Establish and maintain clear professional limits regarding your time, duties and workplace relationships. Loading If more drastic action is required, then seek professional advice, or if you have witnessed something unlawful, then alert the authorities immediately. I always advise against sharing your experiences on social media. Not only can this bring unwanted attention to you from the media and others, it can also lead to litigation that could destroy your reputation for future work. That said, people often feel they have no other option than to go public to bring their toxic boss to “justice”. However, be aware that how the company chooses to deal with the allegations may not be to your satisfaction. Many toxic bosses have received payouts in the millions for bringing untold misery to people who report to them. No human being should ever suffer at the hands of a bad boss and in situations where you cannot quit (which will always be the best option). Employing the strategies that I have outlined here will not only ensure you manage your mental and physical health but also provide you with an opportunity to deal with your toxic boss. Colin D. Ellis is a five-time best-selling author and culture consultant. His latest book Detox Your Culture will be published in Australia on December 3. The Business Briefing newsletter delivers major stories, exclusive coverage and expert opinion. Sign up to get it every weekday morning . Save Log in , register or subscribe to save articles for later. License this article Workplace culture Opinion Workplace Workplace safety Most Viewed in Business LoadingStock market today: Wall Street rises with Nvidia as bitcoin bursts above $99,000baccarat 747

Hills Bank & Trust Co Reduces Stock Position in Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN)Citigroup Inc. grew its stake in JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF ( NYSEARCA:JEPI – Free Report ) by 51.8% during the 3rd quarter, according to its most recent Form 13F filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission. The institutional investor owned 147,827 shares of the company’s stock after acquiring an additional 50,459 shares during the quarter. Citigroup Inc.’s holdings in JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF were worth $8,797,000 at the end of the most recent quarter. Several other institutional investors and hedge funds have also made changes to their positions in the stock. Salomon & Ludwin LLC purchased a new position in JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF in the 3rd quarter valued at about $25,000. HHM Wealth Advisors LLC purchased a new position in shares of JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF during the second quarter valued at approximately $28,000. Running Point Capital Advisors LLC boosted its position in JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF by 131.2% during the third quarter. Running Point Capital Advisors LLC now owns 638 shares of the company’s stock worth $38,000 after acquiring an additional 362 shares during the last quarter. Centerpoint Advisors LLC purchased a new stake in JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF in the 2nd quarter worth approximately $43,000. Finally, Brown Lisle Cummings Inc. raised its holdings in JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF by 48.0% in the 3rd quarter. Brown Lisle Cummings Inc. now owns 786 shares of the company’s stock valued at $47,000 after acquiring an additional 255 shares during the last quarter. JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF Stock Up 0.2 % Shares of JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF stock opened at $60.79 on Friday. JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF has a fifty-two week low of $54.27 and a fifty-two week high of $60.88. The business’s fifty day moving average is $59.49 and its two-hundred day moving average is $57.92. The firm has a market cap of $35.67 billion, a PE ratio of 24.40 and a beta of 0.53. JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF Profile The JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) is an exchange-traded fund that is based on the S&P 500 index. The fund is an actively-managed fund that invests in large-cap US stocks and equity-linked notes (ELNs). It seeks to provide similar returns as the S&P 500 Index with lower volatility and monthly income. Featured Articles Want to see what other hedge funds are holding JEPI? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF ( NYSEARCA:JEPI – Free Report ). Receive News & Ratings for JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .

Lions receiver Jameson Williams won't be charged for having a gun in a carWhen McLaren CEO Zak Brown first joined the Formula 1 team back in 2016, he admitted some surprise about what he found - and not in a good way. From the excitement about joining his favourite squad, the reality check of the 'chaos' he walked into was not an easy one to deal with. As he sits down exclusively with Autosport to reflect on his journey from that low point to get to where McLaren has become constructors’ champion, he admitted that the first impression was "a lot worse than I thought it was.” At the time, the struggles McLaren was facing with Honda were pretty clear to see – but the mistake that many made was thinking that its engine was its only deficit. For Brown, problems were everywhere. “I think we now know that wasn't even probably the biggest part of the issue,” added Brown, who saw problems with management, structure and sponsorship. “You had a revolving door in leadership and chaos at the board level, which has been well documented. “You had no adult supervision on the racing team and people. You've got leaders, but people need good leadership. “On-track sponsorship was at a record low and everything on the factory floor was a conspiracy theory. There was a lot of negativity. “We were way behind on development. I think there was almost an arrogance of ‘we are so good’ that we took our eye off of wind tunnels and CFDs. “So that's kind of what I walked into.” Making change Having spent the first part of his career as a sponsorship guru, Brown knew how to run a big business, but his switch to McLaren was the first time he had stepped into a management role with a racing team of such a scale. And being what he would even admit was a little bit wet behind the ears on that front meant he had to bat away any lack of self-confidence when it came to proving to the staff that he was in this for the long haul. “I'd been around racing," he said, "but actually standing up and talking to a racing team, when they're all staring at you, you could feel the: How long is this guy going to be around? “Everyone else had been around a year or two, and you could kind of feel that. So you had to portray confidence.” Brown says that the priority from day one was sorting out the senior figures, because if that was not right then everything else was doomed. “The first thing I did was change the leadership team, kind of one by one,” he said. “I didn't come in with that in mind, but I quickly identified this place needs new leadership. “Some people I hired I had worked with at JMI [the sponsorship agency founded by Brown]. Some people were brand new. And only one was an internal promotion, which was Laura [Bowden], now our CFO, because to have a great racing team, everything needs to fire on all cylinders, right? “If you're going to have great commercial success, it's got to have a huge fan base. You have got to have a great comms team to engage with the fans. You’ve got to sell sponsors to be able to hire the best people, to do a new wind tunnel. “It's not just have a great aerodynamic department. You've got to have that. But then there's everything that feeds into that.” While changes were taking place behind the scenes to give the Woking factory the management structure it needed, revolution was coming on track too. The Renault wake-up call At the end of 2017, Brown moved to end the Honda partnership and switch the squad to customer Renault engines for the 2018 season, in a change that actually proved to be an awakening moment for a team that had led itself to believe its chassis was as good as anybody else’s out there. Brown added: “That was a great wake up call, because I think everyone thought we were just bolting a new engine in and here we are. But it was actually, ‘we’ve changed that, it’s a little better, but we’ve still got some big issues’ So I think that was healthy.” What followed then were those challenging Covid 2020/2021 campaigns where off track Brown battled to shore up the finances that had left it risking collapse without the support of its shareholders. “We were definitely on the brink," said Brown. "We were paying all our bills, but we were months away, and not several months, from [shutting]. We knew we could make it through the year, but we were in a situation that if we didn't have a cash injection, we would have been at risk.” On track there was the unprecedented situation caused by the unique 2020/2021 campaigns of frozen car development where Brown felt the new team of Andreas Seidl and James Key had the good fortune to inherit a competitive package, and duly get the credit for the previous regime’s efforts. “Everyone kind of thought with the new people that had come in, Seidl, James Key ‘like, wow, look at what they've done in ‘21’ and it was actually the team before," said Brown. "So really the first time their collective work was seen was ’22.” A difficult start to that year, allied to problems Daniel Ricciardo faced, triggered concern for Brown. But the eureka moment for him that things were not where they needed to be came at that year’s French Grand Prix when a much hyped upgrade package failed to deliver. Brown said: “It didn't work, and the response from the leadership, that was not what I expected. I thought we're in trouble now. So I had some pretty serious conversations.” Over the summer break, Brown dealt with the Ricciardo issue as the team and driver reached a deal to end their partnership at the end of the year. Brown also decided, after Seidl had come to him saying he had signed a contract to join Audi, to agree to an early exit so he could make the internal change he wanted: putting current team boss Andrea Stella in charge. “I could have gone [to Seidl], ‘no, hang out your contract’," said Brown. "But it was like, no, actually, congratulations, you can join tomorrow. “I'd actually wanted Andrea Stella to run the team before I made that decision, but he had originally turned it down [over the 2019/2020 winter]. He felt he wasn't ready, and that's the type of guy Andrea is. He’s not ego-driven.” Brown recalls his second more successful attempt to convince Stella to join once it became clear that Seidl would be moving on. “I went: ‘Andrea, I really need you'," added Brown. "He tells a funny story. I was calling, he was having an espresso, and he was like, I need another espresso! “He didn’t accept it on the first call. He was like, ‘let me think about this, it is a big ask.’ But ultimately, I got him over the line.” The Stella impact Brown tasked Stella with doing a root and branches review of the racing team to help shape it in a way that he felt would work best. And, while the Italian had not been willing to shake the tree in his previous capacity as an engineer, now he was in a different role. “I asked him to look at everything," said Brown. "He'd obviously been paying attention, and he's a guy who stays in his lane of authority. But now I was like: ‘I want you to have total authority.’ “We knew the start of '23 was going to be a mess. We made some changes. James Key and Tony Salter, left, and it empowered people like Pete Prodromou, who had been a bit sidelined. “We just put the right guys back in charge, because we didn't really make many new hires. We just restructured it. We then told the media: ‘We're going to have a terrible start to ’23.' And we were spot on! “Then there was the hard part. We were getting blasted by everyone, but our partners were hanging in there, because we'd been on a nice journey, and the shareholders were totally hanging in there. “They all wanted to know, what are you doing? You need to fix this! But I never felt that they weren't going to give me the opportunity.” That beginning of 2023 offered a disconnect between the results the team was delivering on track and the rapid rate of progress with upgrades that were taking place at the factory. Brown said: “We started to see a rate development. Then we had this weird dynamic of getting killed on the race track and publicly slaughtered, with a quiet confidence back at the factory. “I think what was good was we knew we were going to be bad in ‘23 and we called our shot. So it wasn't like we were scratching our head. We knew we weren't going to be good. “At this point, we had got plenty of sponsorship and there was a lot of belief in Andrea's leadership, and that leadership team were firing on all cylinders, right? Across finance, HR, comms, commercial. We were very united, and it made us stronger.” The final steps Confirmation of the upwards trajectory came at the 2023 Austrian Grand Prix, when a planned big upgrade did the job. “Andrea kind of called his shot at Austria, which was out of character for him,” added Brown. “He was like, ‘oh, that's going to be a big one.’ “We rolled it out on Lando's car. It was strong, but then afterwards we knew Lando was always good there, so was it him or was it the car? But then at Silverstone it was 'wow'.” From that moment on, McLaren has built on its form. Developments have worked and the progress has been steady so that when that Miami upgrade arrived in May this year, it catapulted the squad to the front. Brown thinks McLaren is now back to the kind of team that he originally fell in love in. “I think we're on our A-game now,” he said. “We've got the best sponsor portfolio on the grid. I think we have record revenues. We are profitable, which is a sign of the success we've had on track. “But we go racing for trophies, not for economics. I think we're back to the McLaren I knew, which was, 'oh did you see what McLaren did on track or off track.' And I put it all down to people at the end of the day. “We've all got great wind tunnels. We've all got great CFD. But it's the people that make the difference.” And the key focus for Brown now, as his squad celebrates that first F1 constructors’ title since 1998, is ensuring it doesn’t drop the ball now. “If you look at some of the other teams out there, that have got great technology, great drivers, and kind of slid backwards, I think it's because the culture's not where it needs to be,” he said. “My primary goal now is to bottle up what we have right now, add to it where I can, but not let anyone eat, as Andrea calls them, the poison biscuits – which is the politics internally, or the politics that people try and lob in. “It's easy to happen when we have a bad weekend or a weekend we could have done better, but the way Andrea is able to pick the team up and go 'don't go there' it is amazing. It's don't start blaming each other. We're a team. It's just kept us really solid.” In this article Jonathan Noble Formula 1 Be the first to know and subscribe for real-time news email updates on these topics Subscribe to news alertsSMU has plenty to play for when it closes the regular season against California on Saturday afternoon in Dallas. The Mustangs (10-1, 7-0 Atlantic Coast Conference), who checked in at No. 9 in the latest College Football Playoff rankings on Tuesday, would like to send their seniors off the right way. They would also like to complete a perfect regular season before appearing in the ACC title game in their first year in the conference. Most importantly, they want to continue to strengthen their playoff case. "You've got the College Football Playoff, so every game matters. That's what's so cool about it now. The regular season is important," SMU coach Rhett Lashlee said. "We'd like to finish well in everything we do, particularly on Saturday, to finish off the regular season, continue our momentum into the following week. Hopefully, continue to show the committee and others that we're worthy of continuing to play this year." The Mustangs are a worthy playoff team to date. Kevin Jennings has established himself as one of the top quarterbacks in the country, throwing for 2,521 yards with 17 touchdowns and seven interceptions. He also has rushed for 315 yards and four TDs. Brashard Smith has been another standout, rushing for 1,089 yards and 13 TDs. Defensively, the Mustangs rank tied for 14th in the country with 20 takeaways. "Obviously they've had a phenomenal season," Cal coach Justin Wilcox said of SMU. "As soon as you turn the tape on, it doesn't take very long to see why their record is what it is. They're very, very good really in every phase of the game - extremely explosive and quick and fast. They've got a dominant D-line. We've got a lot of challenges in front of us and our guys are excited for that." Cal (6-5, 2-5) is coming off an emotional win, defeating rival Stanford 24-21 on Saturday to secure a bowl berth. The Golden Bears will appear in consecutive bowls for the first time since 2018-19 and are now looking to clinch their first winning season since 2019. SMU is not overlooking Cal, as all five of the Golden Bears' losses have come by one score. "You'd be hard-pressed to find a better 6-5 team in America," Lashlee said. "I think you can conservatively say they very, very easily could be 9-2." Cal is led by quarterback Fernando Mendoza, who has thrown for 3,004 yards with 16 touchdowns and six interceptions. Tight end Jack Endries leads the team with 555 yards receiving, while wide receiver Nyziah Hunter has caught a team-leading five touchdowns. Defensively, Cal has the ACC's top scoring defense (20.7 points per game) and is tied with Clemson for the ACC's best turnover margin (plus-13). Defensive back Nohl Williams is the star of the group -- he leads the country with seven interceptions. Even though oddsmakers are heavily favoring SMU, Cal is going into the game with a simple mindset. "Our task at hand is to make the best bowl game right now," Mendoza said. "And the way to do that is to go into Dallas, give it our best and ruin SMU's season." Saturday will mark the first conference meeting between these ACC newcomers, and just the second meeting between the programs all time. SMU won a 13-6 game back in 1957. --Field Level MediaDespite cuts, OVP still has P600M for aid programs

Telangana: DCA cracks down on unqualified quacks running clinics

Runner's World: Top RBs take flight when Ravens entertain Eagles

Natixis Advisors LLC lessened its holdings in shares of FirstEnergy Corp. ( NYSE:FE – Free Report ) by 3.8% during the 3rd quarter, according to its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm owned 131,941 shares of the utilities provider’s stock after selling 5,262 shares during the quarter. Natixis Advisors LLC’s holdings in FirstEnergy were worth $5,852,000 as of its most recent SEC filing. Several other hedge funds have also added to or reduced their stakes in FE. Empowered Funds LLC raised its position in shares of FirstEnergy by 10.3% during the third quarter. Empowered Funds LLC now owns 9,421 shares of the utilities provider’s stock worth $418,000 after purchasing an additional 881 shares during the period. Empirical Finance LLC increased its stake in FirstEnergy by 1.9% during the 3rd quarter. Empirical Finance LLC now owns 18,234 shares of the utilities provider’s stock worth $809,000 after purchasing an additional 343 shares in the last quarter. CIBC Asset Management Inc raised its holdings in FirstEnergy by 7.5% during the 3rd quarter. CIBC Asset Management Inc now owns 76,488 shares of the utilities provider’s stock worth $3,392,000 after buying an additional 5,306 shares during the period. Metis Global Partners LLC lifted its stake in FirstEnergy by 1.7% in the third quarter. Metis Global Partners LLC now owns 16,916 shares of the utilities provider’s stock valued at $750,000 after buying an additional 288 shares in the last quarter. Finally, KBC Group NV boosted its holdings in shares of FirstEnergy by 33.3% in the third quarter. KBC Group NV now owns 40,331 shares of the utilities provider’s stock valued at $1,789,000 after buying an additional 10,073 shares during the period. Institutional investors and hedge funds own 89.41% of the company’s stock. FirstEnergy Stock Performance NYSE FE opened at $41.80 on Friday. The stock has a market cap of $24.09 billion, a PE ratio of 26.97, a P/E/G ratio of 2.24 and a beta of 0.51. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.58, a quick ratio of 0.46 and a current ratio of 0.56. The firm has a 50-day moving average of $42.87 and a 200-day moving average of $41.42. FirstEnergy Corp. has a 52-week low of $35.41 and a 52-week high of $44.97. FirstEnergy Dividend Announcement The company also recently disclosed a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Sunday, December 1st. Shareholders of record on Thursday, November 7th will be given a dividend of $0.425 per share. This represents a $1.70 annualized dividend and a yield of 4.07%. The ex-dividend date is Thursday, November 7th. FirstEnergy’s payout ratio is 109.68%. Wall Street Analyst Weigh In Several research firms recently commented on FE. Wells Fargo & Company boosted their price objective on shares of FirstEnergy from $42.00 to $45.00 and gave the company an “equal weight” rating in a research report on Thursday, August 1st. Morgan Stanley decreased their price objective on FirstEnergy from $52.00 to $50.00 and set an “overweight” rating for the company in a report on Friday. Jefferies Financial Group began coverage on FirstEnergy in a research report on Monday, October 14th. They issued a “hold” rating and a $46.00 target price on the stock. Bank of America upped their price target on FirstEnergy from $42.00 to $43.00 and gave the stock an “underperform” rating in a research report on Thursday, August 29th. Finally, KeyCorp lifted their price objective on shares of FirstEnergy from $47.00 to $48.00 and gave the company an “overweight” rating in a report on Tuesday, October 22nd. One analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, eight have assigned a hold rating and four have given a buy rating to the company’s stock. According to data from MarketBeat, FirstEnergy has a consensus rating of “Hold” and an average price target of $45.91. Read Our Latest Stock Analysis on FE FirstEnergy Company Profile ( Free Report ) FirstEnergy Corp., through its subsidiaries, generates, transmits, and distributes electricity in the United States. It operates through Regulated Distribution and Regulated Transmission segments. The company owns and operates coal-fired, nuclear, hydroelectric, wind, and solar power generating facilities. Featured Articles Receive News & Ratings for FirstEnergy Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for FirstEnergy and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .

KBC Group NV lowered its stake in shares of Marriott Vacations Worldwide Co. ( NYSE:VAC – Free Report ) by 99.0% during the third quarter, according to the company in its most recent disclosure with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The fund owned 964 shares of the company’s stock after selling 100,000 shares during the period. KBC Group NV’s holdings in Marriott Vacations Worldwide were worth $71,000 as of its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Other institutional investors also recently modified their holdings of the company. Vanguard Group Inc. grew its holdings in Marriott Vacations Worldwide by 4.6% during the first quarter. Vanguard Group Inc. now owns 3,266,238 shares of the company’s stock valued at $351,872,000 after purchasing an additional 143,074 shares during the period. CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE Co increased its position in shares of Marriott Vacations Worldwide by 20.7% in the 1st quarter. CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE Co now owns 24,501 shares of the company’s stock valued at $2,645,000 after buying an additional 4,198 shares in the last quarter. Natixis bought a new stake in shares of Marriott Vacations Worldwide in the 1st quarter valued at $560,000. Impactive Capital LP acquired a new stake in Marriott Vacations Worldwide during the 1st quarter worth $123,613,000. Finally, Kennedy Capital Management LLC lifted its holdings in Marriott Vacations Worldwide by 15.3% during the first quarter. Kennedy Capital Management LLC now owns 238,280 shares of the company’s stock worth $25,670,000 after acquiring an additional 31,637 shares in the last quarter. 89.52% of the stock is currently owned by institutional investors and hedge funds. Wall Street Analysts Forecast Growth Several equities research analysts have recently issued reports on the stock. The Goldman Sachs Group started coverage on shares of Marriott Vacations Worldwide in a research report on Wednesday, September 18th. They set a “sell” rating and a $62.00 price objective for the company. Barclays lifted their price objective on shares of Marriott Vacations Worldwide from $74.00 to $97.00 and gave the company an “equal weight” rating in a research report on Friday, November 8th. Mizuho boosted their target price on Marriott Vacations Worldwide from $110.00 to $117.00 and gave the stock an “outperform” rating in a report on Tuesday, November 12th. Stifel Nicolaus lowered their price target on shares of Marriott Vacations Worldwide from $108.00 to $96.50 and set a “buy” rating on the stock in a report on Friday, September 13th. Finally, JMP Securities lowered their price objective on Marriott Vacations Worldwide from $115.00 to $90.00 and set a “market outperform” rating on the stock in a research report on Friday, August 2nd. One equities research analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, four have issued a hold rating and five have assigned a buy rating to the company. According to data from MarketBeat.com, the company presently has a consensus rating of “Hold” and an average target price of $101.72. Marriott Vacations Worldwide Trading Up 2.3 % Shares of VAC stock opened at $94.07 on Friday. The company has a 50 day moving average of $80.14 and a 200-day moving average of $82.26. Marriott Vacations Worldwide Co. has a 12-month low of $67.28 and a 12-month high of $108.57. The firm has a market cap of $3.28 billion, a P/E ratio of 17.92, a PEG ratio of 0.81 and a beta of 1.79. The company has a quick ratio of 2.86, a current ratio of 3.53 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 2.19. Marriott Vacations Worldwide Announces Dividend The company also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which was paid on Thursday, October 3rd. Stockholders of record on Thursday, September 19th were issued a $0.76 dividend. The ex-dividend date was Thursday, September 19th. This represents a $3.04 annualized dividend and a dividend yield of 3.23%. Marriott Vacations Worldwide’s payout ratio is currently 57.90%. Insiders Place Their Bets In related news, insider Jason P. Marino acquired 700 shares of Marriott Vacations Worldwide stock in a transaction dated Wednesday, September 11th. The shares were purchased at an average cost of $69.00 per share, with a total value of $48,300.00. Following the completion of the purchase, the insider now owns 15,851 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $1,093,719. This represents a 4.62 % increase in their ownership of the stock. The transaction was disclosed in a filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available at this hyperlink . Corporate insiders own 1.70% of the company’s stock. Marriott Vacations Worldwide Profile ( Free Report ) Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation, a vacation company, develops, markets, sells, and manages vacation ownership and related businesses, products, and services in the United States and internationally. It operates through two segments, Vacation Ownership and Exchange & Third-Party Management. Further Reading Receive News & Ratings for Marriott Vacations Worldwide Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Marriott Vacations Worldwide and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .

Colorado's 2-way star Travis Hunter eyes Big 12 title and more before 'for sure' entering NFL draftHardship: PDP govs urge Tinubu to review economic policies

DURHAM, N.H. (AP) — Kinkead Dent threw for 246 yards and ran for another 56 yards and a touchdown as UT Martin rolled to a 41-10 win over New Hampshire in an FCS first-round game on Saturday. The Skyhawks (9-4) advance to face unbeaten and top-seeded Montana State (12-0) in the second round. UT Martin's rushing game amassed 236 yards on 52 carries and five different backs reached the end zone. Meanwhile, the Skyhawks limited New Hampshire to 124 yards of total offense and held the Wildcats' run game to just 53 yards on 16 carries. Rashad Raymond scored from 4-yards out midway through the first quarter to put UT Martin on the board first and All-Big South/OVC first-team running back Patrick Smith added a 3-yard scoring run in the second to take a 17-7 lead. Dent capped an eight-play, 80-yard drive by nosing in from the 2 and Jaren Van Winkle kicked field goals from 30- and 36-yards to make it 24-7 at intermission. Trevonte Rucker scored from the 4 to start the fourth quarter and Glover Cook III punched in from the 1 to complete the scoring. Dent Completed 17 of 26 passes without an interception. Rucker caught nine passes for 98 yards and DeVonte Tanksley caught four for 81, including a 56-yard reception. Smith carried 15 times for 71 yards. Glover had 12 carries for 56. Seth Morgan was held to 14 of 35 passing with an interception for New Hampshire (8-5). Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here . AP college football: https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-college-football-poll and https://apnews.com/hub/college-football

Bihar bypolls: Prashant Kishor's Jan Suraaj Party fails to open account, all 4 candidates lostSalesforce Grants Equity Awards to Tenyx, PredictSpring, and Zoomin Employees Under Its Inducement Equity Incentive PlanKatsina coalition expresses concern over proposed 2025 health budget